Recent Question

Human Resources Question – Wal-Mart
1000 words

It is suggested in the Wal-Mart case that a great deal of success for the organisation comes from being non-unionized (see comments on pages 5-6 that the distribution systems benefit from having a non-unionized in-house trucking fleet and page 9 where the authors state -Without cumbersome labour agreements, management could take advantage of technology to drive labour costs down and make operational changes quickly and efficiently.-). The case goes on to discuss aggressive external union tactics to undermine Wal-Mart expansion, presumably focusing on how Wal-Mart approaches and treats its staff.

You have been hired as a human resources (HR) consultant to craft and recommend an internal policy directive or HR strategy that directly addresses this threat. As part of this statement, be sure to state why you believe this direction is important to take, how it fits in with any overall company strategies, and how it addresses the matter of Wal-Mart being accused of union busting in past situations.

Here are some chapters
I’m sure you can find them online or google books
Human resources

• Lesson 1: Strategic Human Resource Management
• Lesson 2: Work Design and Motivation
• Lesson 3: Leadership
• Lesson 4: Groups and Teams
• Lesson 5: Human Resource Flow
• Lesson 6: Rewards and Performance Management
• Lesson 7: Diversity Management and Inclusiveness
• Lesson 8: The Future of the Human Resources Role

• It is not sufficient to cite -author X- or articles without involving them in proper, in-depth, case-specific analysis.
• If you wish to use references external to support your responses, please feel free to do so, but you are required to provide a full reference.
• A cover sheet, executive summary, table of contents, and bibliography are not required, but a list of references is required. APA citation style requirements)
• Provide structure to your response by using headings and subheadings that address each part of the question.
• Use tables and point form where appropriate, but use a narrative style rather than point form alone for areas requiring elaboration and for answers requiring discussion and explanation.